Main Page: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Larry Sanger, Wikipedia Co-founder, has outlined the problems with that website in broad strokes: | Larry Sanger, Wikipedia Co-founder, has outlined the problems with that website in broad strokes: | ||
<blockquote>it endorses the utterly bankrupt canard that journalists should avoid what they call “false balance.” The notion that we should avoid “false balance” is directly contradictory to the original neutrality policy. As a result, even as journalists turn to opinion and activism, Wikipedia now touts controversial points of view on politics, religion, and science. </blockquote>https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/<blockquote>if a subject is controversial, Wikipedia pushes the “establishment point of view on pretty much everything.” </blockquote>https://sarahwestall.com/wikipedia-co-founder-says-sites-leftism-has-rendered-it-propaganda/<blockquote>“When schoolkids ... look up socialism ... they’re going to find an explanation that completely ignores any conservative, libertarian, or critical treatment of the subject. And that’s really problematic. That’s not education. That’s propaganda.” </blockquote>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/1025361/thats-propaganda-wikipedia-co-founder-criticizes-websites-monitoring-of-socialism-page/ | <blockquote>it endorses the utterly bankrupt canard that journalists should avoid what they call “false balance.” The notion that we should avoid “false balance” is directly contradictory to the original neutrality policy. As a result, even as journalists turn to opinion and activism, Wikipedia now touts controversial points of view on politics, religion, and science. </blockquote><ref> https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/</ref><blockquote>if a subject is controversial, Wikipedia pushes the “establishment point of view on pretty much everything.” </blockquote><ref>https://sarahwestall.com/wikipedia-co-founder-says-sites-leftism-has-rendered-it-propaganda/</ref> <blockquote>“When schoolkids ... look up socialism ... they’re going to find an explanation that completely ignores any conservative, libertarian, or critical treatment of the subject. And that’s really problematic. That’s not education. That’s propaganda.” </blockquote><ref> https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/1025361/thats-propaganda-wikipedia-co-founder-criticizes-websites-monitoring-of-socialism-page/ </ref> | ||
== Contributing == | == Contributing == | ||
In order to maintain standards of high quality across the wiki, editing is by invite-only and prospective editors will be heavily vetted. Please email [email protected] if you are interested in contributing to the project. | In order to maintain standards of high quality across the wiki, editing is by invite-only and prospective editors will be heavily vetted. Please email [email protected] if you are interested in contributing to the project. | ||
== References == | |||
<references /> | |||
Revision as of 22:00, 9 September 2025
Uncensored Wiki is the world's first authoritative, accurate, and uncensored wiki.
Mainstream wikis and the media in general are biased in predictable ways. These institutions work to strategically silence valuable information that is of interest to the public, while amplifying noise and spreading false narratives.
Larry Sanger, Wikipedia Co-founder, has outlined the problems with that website in broad strokes:
it endorses the utterly bankrupt canard that journalists should avoid what they call “false balance.” The notion that we should avoid “false balance” is directly contradictory to the original neutrality policy. As a result, even as journalists turn to opinion and activism, Wikipedia now touts controversial points of view on politics, religion, and science.
if a subject is controversial, Wikipedia pushes the “establishment point of view on pretty much everything.”
“When schoolkids ... look up socialism ... they’re going to find an explanation that completely ignores any conservative, libertarian, or critical treatment of the subject. And that’s really problematic. That’s not education. That’s propaganda.”
Contributing
In order to maintain standards of high quality across the wiki, editing is by invite-only and prospective editors will be heavily vetted. Please email [email protected] if you are interested in contributing to the project.