Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Mainstream wikis and the media in general are biased in predictable ways. These institutions work to strategically silence valuable information that is of interest to the public, while amplifying noise and spreading false narratives. | Mainstream wikis and the media in general are biased in predictable ways. These institutions work to strategically silence valuable information that is of interest to the public, while amplifying noise and spreading false narratives. | ||
[[Larry Sanger]], [[Wikipedia]] Co-founder, has outlined the problems with | == Criticisms of Wikipedia == | ||
[[Larry Sanger]], [[Wikipedia]] Co-founder, has outlined the problems with Wikipedia in broad strokes: | |||
<blockquote>it endorses the utterly bankrupt canard that journalists should avoid what they call “false balance.” The notion that we should avoid “false balance” is directly contradictory to the original neutrality policy. As a result, even as journalists turn to opinion and activism, Wikipedia now touts controversial points of view on politics, religion, and science.<ref> https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/</ref> </blockquote><blockquote>if a subject is controversial, Wikipedia pushes the “establishment point of view on pretty much everything.”<ref>https://sarahwestall.com/wikipedia-co-founder-says-sites-leftism-has-rendered-it-propaganda/</ref> </blockquote><blockquote>“When schoolkids ... look up socialism ... they’re going to find an explanation that completely ignores any conservative, libertarian, or critical treatment of the subject. And that’s really problematic. That’s not education. That’s propaganda.”<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/1025361/thats-propaganda-wikipedia-co-founder-criticizes-websites-monitoring-of-socialism-page/</ref> </blockquote> | <blockquote>it endorses the utterly bankrupt canard that journalists should avoid what they call “false balance.” The notion that we should avoid “false balance” is directly contradictory to the original neutrality policy. As a result, even as journalists turn to opinion and activism, Wikipedia now touts controversial points of view on politics, religion, and science.<ref> https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/</ref> </blockquote><blockquote>if a subject is controversial, Wikipedia pushes the “establishment point of view on pretty much everything.”<ref>https://sarahwestall.com/wikipedia-co-founder-says-sites-leftism-has-rendered-it-propaganda/</ref> </blockquote><blockquote>“When schoolkids ... look up socialism ... they’re going to find an explanation that completely ignores any conservative, libertarian, or critical treatment of the subject. And that’s really problematic. That’s not education. That’s propaganda.”<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/1025361/thats-propaganda-wikipedia-co-founder-criticizes-websites-monitoring-of-socialism-page/</ref> </blockquote> | ||
== Featured Article == | |||
'''Currently Featured:''' [[Nationalist Organizations]] | |||
== Contributing == | == Contributing == | ||
Uncensored Wiki is a project run by [[The New Way]]. Pages and edits are maintained by vetted members. If you are interested in contributing, apply to join our organization here: https://applications.thenewway.info/s/cm9igcxc7000ann01m598emwf | Uncensored Wiki is a project run by [[The New Way]]. Pages and edits are maintained by vetted members. If you are interested in contributing, apply to join our organization here: https://applications.thenewway.info/s/cm9igcxc7000ann01m598emwf | ||
Revision as of 22:20, 20 September 2025
Uncensored Wiki is the world's first authoritative, accurate, and uncensored wiki.
Mainstream wikis and the media in general are biased in predictable ways. These institutions work to strategically silence valuable information that is of interest to the public, while amplifying noise and spreading false narratives.
Criticisms of Wikipedia
Larry Sanger, Wikipedia Co-founder, has outlined the problems with Wikipedia in broad strokes:
it endorses the utterly bankrupt canard that journalists should avoid what they call “false balance.” The notion that we should avoid “false balance” is directly contradictory to the original neutrality policy. As a result, even as journalists turn to opinion and activism, Wikipedia now touts controversial points of view on politics, religion, and science.[1]
if a subject is controversial, Wikipedia pushes the “establishment point of view on pretty much everything.”[2]
“When schoolkids ... look up socialism ... they’re going to find an explanation that completely ignores any conservative, libertarian, or critical treatment of the subject. And that’s really problematic. That’s not education. That’s propaganda.”[3]
Featured Article
Currently Featured: Nationalist Organizations
Contributing
Uncensored Wiki is a project run by The New Way. Pages and edits are maintained by vetted members. If you are interested in contributing, apply to join our organization here: https://applications.thenewway.info/s/cm9igcxc7000ann01m598emwf
Contact
For general inquiries, reach out to [email protected].